Olaf Le Bou a écrit:C'est fou ça, y'en a des qui développent des outils, et paf, voilà-t-il pas que certains s'en servent.
et, en plus, ils ne disent même pas merci

:
Russian, North Korean and Iranian diplomatic officials didn't immediately return messages seeking comment on the allegations.
Par contre, tout ce qui passe par les modèles d'IA est scruté par qui de droit...
The report described hacking groups using the large language models differently.
Hackers alleged to working on behalf of Russia military spy agency, widely known as the GRU, used the models to research "various satellite and radar technologies that may pertain to conventional military operations in Ukraine," Microsoft said.
Microsoft said North Korean hackers used the models to generate content "that would likely be for use in spear-phishing campaigns" against regional experts. Iranian hackers also leaned on the models to write more convincing emails, Microsoft said, at one point using them to draft a message attempting to lure "prominent feminists" to a booby trapped website.
The software giant said Chinese state-backed hackers were also experimenting with large language models, for example to ask questions about rival intelligence agencies, cybersecurity issues, and "notable individuals."
Neither Burt nor Rotsted would be drawn on the volume of activity or how many accounts had been suspended. And Burt defended the zero-tolerance ban on hacking groups - which doesn't extend to Microsoft offerings such as its search engine, Bing - by pointing to the novelty of AI and the concern over its deployment.